Finding a qualified female CFO for an international role has historically been one of the most challenging executive search mandates. Traditional search firms take 8 to 12 weeks, operate on retainer fees, and often present homogeneous shortlists that underrepresent female candidates. This guide walks CHROs and CEOs through a faster, more effective approach.

Why Female CFO Searches Fail

Most executive search firms draw from the same networks. When diversity is an afterthought rather than a design principle, female candidates are systematically underrepresented in shortlists — not because they don’t exist, but because the search methodology isn’t built to find them.

A Dedicated Database Changes Everything

Female Executive Search (www.female-executive-search.com), powered by CEO Worldwide, maintains a dedicated pool of vetted female C-level executives across 183 countries. Every candidate has been verified through professional reference checks and competency interviews.

The result: a curated shortlist of qualified female CFO candidates delivered within 7–10 business days of your search mandate.

What to Include in Your Search Mandate

To receive the most relevant shortlist, your mandate should specify:

• Geography (country or region of assignment)
• Industry sector and company size
• Interim or permanent placement
• Language requirements – Key competencies (M&A experience, IPO readiness, cost transformation, etc.)

Submit Your Search Today

Submit your female executive search mandate at www.female-executive-search.com/hire-a-female-executive/submit-a-search-mandate/ and receive your first shortlist within 7–10 business days.

Last Updated: March 04, 2026

The C-suite refers to the upper echelons of a company’s senior managers and executives — the leaders who steer organizations toward growth, profitability, and long-term success. The letter “C” in these positions stands for “Chief,” and while specific job titles vary by corporation and industry, all C-level executives share a common mandate: making the critical decisions that shape the future of the business.

C-level executives report to the board of directors, stakeholders, and in some cases, to one another within a defined corporate hierarchy. They work hand-in-hand to ensure the corporation’s operations and strategies align with its policies and goals, correcting course when business activities — including investing, operating, and financing — don’t generate sufficient value for shareholders. As of 2026, equity-based awards now constitute over 65% of total executive compensation at Fortune 500 companies, reflecting the growing emphasis on performance-aligned pay. These senior executives are among the highest compensated professionals in any organization.

So what are the different types of C-level executives, what do they do, and how much do they earn? Below is a comprehensive guide to the most important C-suite roles in 2026.

1. Chief Executive Officer (CEO)

The CEO is the most senior C-suite executive in a company and the ultimate decision-maker. The Chief Executive Officer answers to the Board of Directors — a group of professionals elected by shareholders to look after their interests. The CEO is responsible for setting the company’s strategic direction, managing its overall performance, and maximizing long-term shareholder value.

In small firms, the Chief Executive Officer is typically the founder or owner. In larger companies, the board of directors recruits the CEO, who then has the mandate to appoint other C-level executives. Together, the C-suite team gives the company its direction and leadership.

The right Chief Executive Officer should have a wide range of skills, including:

• Strong communication and public speaking skills
• Strategic thinking and long-term planning abilities
• Decisive decision-making under pressure
• Growth mindset and adaptability
• Deep market and customer knowledge
• Corporate governance and stakeholder management expertise

Roles of the Chief Executive Officer

• Develop and implement the company’s strategic objectives and direction
• Communicate with the board of directors and implement board decisions
• Establish and maintain the company’s culture and values
• Represent the company publicly — investor relations, media, partnerships
• Oversee budgeting, forecasting, and overall company performance
• Evaluate and appoint other C-suite executives and senior leaders

Average salary: CEO compensation varies dramatically by company size. S&P 500 CEOs earned an average of $18.9 million in total compensation in 2024 (a 7% increase year-over-year), while private company CEOs had a median base salary of $325,000. The CEO-to-worker pay ratio stands at 285-to-1 among S&P 500 companies.

2. Chief Operating Officer (COO)

The Chief Operating Officer is the second in command to the CEO and serves as the company’s operational backbone. The main objective of the COO is to ensure the organization’s day-to-day operations run smoothly and efficiently. Often referred to as the CEO’s “right hand,” the COO translates the CEO’s strategic vision into actionable plans across all departments.

The COO focuses on various areas including process optimization, team management, supply chain operations, and cross-functional coordination. A COO must have strong business acumen and the ability to supervise multidisciplinary teams. Essential skills include managerial expertise, excellent communication, leadership, and strong analytical capabilities.

Roles of the Chief Operating Officer

• Oversee day-to-day operations of the company
• Design and implement the company’s strategies, procedures, and operational plans
• Set comprehensive goals for operational growth and efficiency
• Lead employees to encourage maximum dedication and performance
• Manage relationships with key partners and vendors
• Evaluate performance by analyzing data and operational metrics

Average salary: According to ERI Economic Research Institute, the average COO salary in the U.S. is approximately $340,000, while Salary.com reports around $466,000 in total compensation. COOs at large public companies can exceed $650,000 plus significant equity packages. In the S&P 500, COOs earn around 38–42% of CEO compensation.

3. Chief Financial Officer (CFO)

The Chief Financial Officer holds the top financial position in a corporation. The CFO is responsible for analyzing the firm’s financial strengths and weaknesses, tracking cash flow, managing risk, and proposing strategic financial direction. In 2025, the CFO role has evolved beyond traditional number-crunching — today’s CFOs are strategic partners who drive business growth, oversee digital transformation of financial systems, and manage increasingly complex regulatory compliance.

The Chief Financial Officer must have a diverse skill set including financial modeling, problem-solving, decision-making, leadership, communication, and advanced data analytics skills.

Roles of the Chief Financial Officer

• Identify and address financial risks and opportunities
• Oversee the company’s fiscal activity, financial reporting, and compliance
• Review financial reports with the aim of reducing costs and improving margins
• Supervise the budgeting, forecasting, and financial reporting teams
• Manage investor relations and communicate financial performance to stakeholders
• Guide capital allocation, fundraising, and M&A strategy

Average salary: According to Salary.com, the average CFO salary in the U.S. is approximately $437,000. Glassdoor reports an average of $361,000 with top earners reaching $660,000. The median for 2025 falls between $300,000 and $450,000, though Fortune 500 CFOs can earn $3 million to $10 million+ in total compensation. In the Russell 3000, CFOs consistently earn 37–39% of CEO pay.

4. Chief Technology Officer (CTO)

The Chief Technology Officer is in charge of the company’s technological strategy, innovation, and research & development. The CTO reports to the CEO and in some organizations may also be referred to as the Chief Technical Officer. This executive evaluates both short-term and long-term technology needs to invest in solutions that help the firm reach its strategic objectives.

In 2026, the CTO role has expanded significantly, driven by the AI revolution, digital transformation, and growing cybersecurity demands. According to Deloitte’s latest tech executive survey, half of all companies now have four or more C-level technology roles — a decade ago, CTO and CIO covered the entire technology leadership surface. A strong CTO should have expertise in software architecture, AI and emerging technologies, cybersecurity, IT infrastructure, R&D management, and product lifecycle strategy.

Roles of the Chief Technology Officer

• Identify and implement innovative technologies including AI and automation
• Monitor IT budget and KPIs to assess technological performance
• Ensure technological resources fulfill the company’s needs in both the short and long term
• Outline firm goals and timelines for research and development
• Manage product lifecycle, data infrastructure, and engineering teams
• Oversee cybersecurity strategy and technology risk management

Average salary: According to Salary.com, the average CTO salary in the U.S. is approximately $309,000, while ZipRecruiter reports an average of around $167,000 (reflecting a wider range that includes smaller companies). In the tech sector, CTOs are in especially high demand due to the AI boom, with salaries often exceeding $220,000 at mid-sized firms and reaching well into the millions at major tech companies when equity is included.

5. Chief Marketing Officer (CMO)

The Chief Marketing Officer is a senior executive responsible for driving the company’s revenue growth through marketing strategy, brand positioning, and customer acquisition. The primary objective of a CMO is to generate demand and increase sales by managing everything from brand identity and digital marketing to market research and customer experience.

In today’s digital-first landscape, the CMO’s role has expanded to encompass data-driven marketing, AI-powered personalization, social media strategy, and performance analytics across multiple channels. The Chief Marketing Officer should possess skills in data analysis, effective communication, leadership, market intelligence, digital strategy, and customer advocacy.

Roles of the Chief Marketing Officer

• Develop and oversee the corporation’s overall marketing, advertising, and brand strategy
• Drive revenue growth by increasing customer acquisition and retention
• Coordinate marketing efforts with the firm’s branding, financial, and growth goals
• Manage digital marketing, content strategy, and social media presence
• Conduct market research, competitive analysis, and pricing strategy
• Develop and manage the marketing department structure and budget

Average salary: CMO compensation in the U.S. typically ranges from $190,000 to $350,000, depending on company size and industry. In the tech startup ecosystem, CMO salaries range from $250,000 to $400,000 at Series A through Series D companies. In the S&P 500, CMOs have seen the most notable increase in relative compensation in recent years, rising from 27% of CEO pay in 2020 to 33% in 2024.

6. Chief Legal Officer (CLO)

The CLO is the head of the corporate legal department and is responsible for all legal affairs within the organization. The Chief Legal Officer provides legal counsel to the CEO, the Board of Directors, and the Chairman of the Board, ensuring the company operates within the law and manages legal risks effectively. As regulatory environments grow more complex — from data privacy laws to international compliance requirements — the CLO’s role has become increasingly strategic.

A good CLO should have excellent interpersonal, negotiation, and analytical skills, with deep knowledge of corporate law, regulatory compliance, intellectual property, and risk management.

Roles of the Chief Legal Officer

• Develop and implement corporate legal strategy
• Participate in the formulation of general management and governance policy
• Maintain proper corporate interactions with relevant federal, state, and international government agencies
• Oversee delivery of legal services and manage outside counsel
• Manage compliance, data privacy, and regulatory risk across jurisdictions
• Advise on mergers, acquisitions, contracts, and intellectual property

Average salary: CLOs in the U.S. earn approximately $190,000 to $350,000, with those at large public companies earning significantly more. In the S&P 500, CLOs earn roughly 30% of CEO compensation. Companies with heavy regulatory requirements — such as financial services, healthcare, and tech — tend to offer higher CLO pay.

7. Chief Data Officer (CDO)

The CDO is responsible for the company’s strategic use of data — one of the most valuable assets any modern organization possesses. With the rapid adoption of AI, machine learning, and advanced analytics, the CDO role has grown enormously in importance. Data utilization drives productivity gains, improves existing revenue streams, and opens entirely new business opportunities.

The Chief Data Officer should be able to bridge the gap between technical data teams and business leadership, with expertise in data architecture, analytics, governance, privacy regulations (such as GDPR and CCPA), and ethical AI practices.

Roles of the Chief Data Officer

• Design data architecture, analytics infrastructure, and AI/ML pipelines
• Protect collected data from breaches and ensure security compliance
• Keep up with evolving data regulations including GDPR, CCPA, and AI governance frameworks
• Ensure the company is using data ethically and responsibly
• Develop systems and processes for organization-wide data analysis and insights
• Align data strategy with overall business objectives and revenue goals

Average salary: CDO salaries in the U.S. typically range from $180,000 to $350,000, with total compensation packages at larger companies reaching $500,000 or more when equity and bonuses are included. As AI and data-driven strategies become central to competitive advantage, demand for experienced CDOs continues to grow.

8. Other Emerging C-Suite Roles

The C-suite continues to expand as businesses face new challenges and opportunities. Several newer executive roles have become increasingly common in 2025:

• Chief Information Officer (CIO) — Oversees internal technology systems, enterprise IT infrastructure, cybersecurity, and systems integration. Distinct from the CTO, the CIO focuses on internal IT operations rather than customer-facing technology.
• Chief Human Resources Officer (CHRO) — Leads talent strategy, workforce planning, organizational culture, diversity initiatives, and employee experience. Also sometimes called the Chief People Officer (CPO).
• Chief Revenue Officer (CRO) — Owns the overall revenue strategy and aligns sales, marketing, and customer success teams around shared growth targets. An increasingly popular role in SaaS and high-growth companies.
• Chief Sustainability Officer (CSO) — Manages ESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance) strategy, sustainability initiatives, and corporate responsibility reporting.
• Chief AI Officer (CAIO) — A rapidly emerging role focused on enterprise AI strategy, responsible AI deployment, and integrating artificial intelligence across business functions.

C-Suite Salary Comparison at a Glance

Note: Ranges reflect averages across company sizes and data sources. Total compensation at large public companies — including equity, bonuses, and long-term incentives — can be significantly higher.

Different Types of C-Level Executives: Conclusion

The C-suite is more diverse and specialized than ever before. From the traditional core roles — CEO, COO, CFO — to rapidly expanding positions like the Chief Data Officer and Chief AI Officer, today’s executive leadership teams must cover an increasingly wide range of strategic functions. Understanding what each C-level executive does, how they contribute to company success, and what they earn is essential for anyone building or working within a leadership team.

For organizations operating across multiple countries, partnering with specialized HR solutions providers can help leadership teams navigate cross-border employment compliance, payroll, and international hiring requirements.

If you’re looking to recruit experienced C-level executives for your organization, CEO Worldwide can help. We specialize in risk-free, fast, and flexible executive recruitment services, placing top C-suite talent — including CEOs, COOs, CFOs, CTOs, and CMOs — across 183 countries in as little as 7 to 10 days. Contact us to learn more about our executive recruitment services.

Alberto Elli looks where the resources are concentrated during the three major temporal blocks of an acquisition

After so many years of being involved in business development, I think one of the most critical moment in an acquisition is the integration phase, when there are great chances to destroy shareholders’ value.

Let’s see where the resources are concentrated during the three major temporal blocks of an acquisition:

1. Strategic intent, target setting and proforma decision to justify the deal price. Great focus from top management, quite unrealistic expectations pushed both from inside (needs for growth) and from outside (bankers driven by fees as a percent of acquisition price).
2. Negotiations and closing. Seller, buyer and advisors have strong vested interests to get the deal done, also stretching proforma. Maximum peak of resources involved: multi-functional team from the acquirer and handsomely paid consultants from outside: lawyers, environmental experts, tax experts and accountants, bankers for financing and for advising on the deal. Once Due Diligence is completed (and at times it is done too quickly and without depth) and Purchase Price is set, all these actors tend to disappears because they have reaped the biggest rewards.
3. Once Senior Management is on a new acquisition and the “clock” of external advisors has been stopped, the local team and a bit of divisional support is left with the huge task of integrating the new acquisition and to deliver the shareholders’ value they are committed to.

RISK ASSESSMENT

To better understand the challenges of integration, an analytical risk assessment will help to highlight the areas that will need most management attention and dedicated resources. The following model can be run both in a qualitative way (describing the issues) and in a quantitative way (assigning values to each variable based on prior integrations experience). The latter approach is particularly valid for “serial acquirers” that will quickly size the risks and assign internal or external resources based on prior experiences and … lessons learned!

Nature of the transaction
1   Clarity of Strategic intent
2   Board of Directors Approval
3   Highly leveraged
4   Proforma on more than 5 yrs.
5   Acquisition and integration costs budgeted
6   Target, public or private
7   New Market Entry
8   Bolt-on acquisition
9   Transformational
10  Joint Venture
11  Minority Participation

Complexity “up-front”
12  Sales $10 – $50 Mill. Or more
13  Multi-divisional
14  Multi-geography
15  Plants to shut-down
16  People to reorganize / downsize
17  Due Diligence -> major adjustments
18  Net Worth Adjustments
19  Ear-out on multiple years

Customer Facing / Front Office
20  Key Management to Retain
21  Criticality of customers – Sales retention
22  Criticality of customers – Terms&Condition
23  Bad Debts Reserve
24  Compliance issues / severity – FCPA specific

Back Office
25  IT integration complexity
26  ERP to implement
27  Business Intelligence
28  Supply Chain established
29  Production Planning
30  Safety Procedure
31  Inventory management / slow moving
32  Centralized Purchasing
33  Critical Suppliers
34  Finance – closing and reporting in less than 5 days
35  Finance – monthly B/S reconciliations
36  Finance – Cost Accounting
37  Finance – Bank relationships, complexity
38  Finance – Cash Flow Management
39  Finance – Tax strategy
40  Risk Management – Insurance and Legal support
41  HR – Payroll (internal or Outsourced)
42  HR – Labor Contracts repository
43  HR – Benefits defined, perquisites definition
44  HR – Pension Plans assumptions understood and funded

Others
45  Culture, consonant or dissonant to acquirer
46  Regulatory and IP protection, criticality of issues
47  Warranties on long term sales contracts
48  Warranties on long term purchasing contracts
49  Documentation of Labs procedure
50  FX hedging in place

WHO HAS TO LEAD THE INTEGRATION PROCESS?

Every each integration is different but the best practices on the resources needed have informed the following considerations:

1)  CFO (Acquiring or the acquired)

Given the ultimate goal to deliver on expected shareholders’ value creation, the involvement of the acquiring CFO is very important but cannot be the sole responsible, given the many others concurrent responsibilities. At times, the acquired CFO has been asked to lead the integration; results are mixed because the internal knowledge can be over weighted by the temporary nature of his/her mandate. Only if the acquired CFO will have a long term place in the organization, the integration role works pretty well, actually if executed with excellence is the best entry in the new organization.

2)  Internal Project Leader (Full time or part-time)

PMO skills are needed; either imparted through internal training or available in specific professionals but the true integration leadership is quite different: best is to have a manager that is slotted to become the leader of the acquired entity or the leader of another acquisition.
Depending the size of the organization and the frequency of acquisitions, the investment of full-time resources is to be considered; the experience is usually multi-functional and the resource can be redeployed quite easily.

3)  External Project Leader

Solution to consider when the acquisition is one-off or is particularly complicated from a geographical/cultural point of view. Difficult to recruit the right profile but once is individuated the scope, the timing and the cost is fixed, even more important is the independence from internal politics and divisional agendas.

4)  Internal Team (permanent or ad-hoc)

Best practice is to form a full-time internal group of experts that can be redeployed after the acquisition is integrated or kept as a team if more are foreseen. To be noted that integration can be a relatively compressed time frame but full achievement of synergies can be a longer effort, like for Supply Chain and for IT in the contest of ERP implementations.

5)  External Team

Risky proposition in term of having the right quality and number of resources for all the time needed to complete integration. Once a resource is hired for a functional area, always ask to identify a back-fill. If possible, try to shy away from time and material contracts in favor of closed end sum, or based on payment at milestones’ achievement.

CONCLUSION

Clarity of the objectives to achieve, well defined timetable, proactive risk assessment and correct deployment of resources are key to a successful integration that will deliver the full value of an acquisition.

About the author: Alberto Elli for the last three years has been Interim-Chief Financial Officer for private and PE-owned companies in the space of consumer electronics and fashion, leading processes of turnaround and exit strategies.

From 2008 to 2013, he was Vice President and Controller of Sherwin-Williams Global Finishes Group (OH) (Automotive Finishes; Chemical Coatings; Protective and Marine Coatings and Emerging Markets) with about $3 billion Sales. Since inception, in 2008, the Group grew sales 70% both organic and with several acquisitions. Alberto joined Sherwin-Williams in 2006 as Vice President and Controller of the International Division after ten year experience in the pharmaceutical industry with Schering-Plough. His first assignment was as Finance Director in Italy and he was later promoted VP of Finance for the Healthcare Division headquartered in US-NJ and after three years was named VP of Finance, Pharma International, a group of $4 billion Sales. From 1985 to 1996, Alberto held various financial positions in Italy, the last of which was from 1989 to 1996 as Finance Director for SCA, a leading Swedish multinational in paper and packaging industry.

Alberto earned his degree of Dottore in Economia e Commercio from the Universita’ L.Bocconi, Milano, Italy

Outsourcing and offshoring projects: It is autumn; we are in the Indian city of Pune. Twenty Indian project managers, business analysts and software engineers have gathered in a training room. They want to learn how they can successfully bring the cooperation with a customer whose team is distributed across Germany and the United States back on track. At the moment, however, every single one of them is frustrated. The global programme, in which they work, is destined for disaster.

Uncertainty adds to frustration

Collaboration with that client began last spring with such vigour and enthusiasm. But now everything is just sluggish. The programme manager has already been replaced, and the projects associated with the programme are being rescheduled. Uncertainty adds to frustration. The overall mood is strained, emails are responded to in monosyllables and conference calls are cancelled at short notice. The Indian team members ask: how can the transfer of know-how take place under such conditions? How are we to work cooperatively with the customer at all?

For their company, a world-renowned Indian IT service provider, a lot is at stake. The programme has a volume worth of almost twenty million dollars. An early stop would not only mean a financial loss. It would also damage the reputation of the company, which, of course, would be expensive to repair.

After lengthy evaluations, considerations and due diligence, the client, a multinational pharmaceutical company, has decided to finally outsource its core applications to the Indian company. Up to now, the pharma company has been buying software development services from another vendor in India. These included a few non-critical applications and databases in a pure offshoring model. But this new, comprehensive programme involves the heart of the company’s IT.

For many of the pharma company’s IT staff the core applications are “their babies”. The company’s executive board, above all the CIO and the CFO, have decided that it is time to entrust this now grown-up child into foreign hands. Their objective is to save costs and, at the same time, take a technological leap forward. This can be achieved by not only transferring know-how to the new Indian partner, but also by systematically organising a reverse transfer of technology, processes, best practices and skills.

At the training in Pune, I ask the Indian team to form small working groups and ask them to write down, in an unadorned fashion, where the shoe pinches. Here are the results:

• “We get the feeling that the client teams in Germany and the USA are not treating us at peer level.”
• “Our client does not share the big picture with us. But we need to know it in order to deliver the work we committed to.”
• “We are never clear about their expectations.”
• “We’ve been told several times to be more creative and self-driven. But when we become proactive, our colleagues in Germany and the USA do not welcome it.”
• “They don’t have confidence in our capabilities.”
• “It is difficult for us to understand their accent in the English language.”
• “They seem to value time and deadlines above everything else!”

Ten days later I meet the customer team in Frankfurt (Germany) and a week later the one in Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States. These teams participate in the same training, but with a reverse angle. How do the customer teams experience the cooperation with their new Indian colleagues? What do they find difficult? Where do they need help?

Their answers are as sobering as those the Indian team gave:

• “Our Indian colleagues seek approval from their management for everything we ask of them.”
• “Since we started working with the Indian service provider, micro management at our end has grown considerably!” · “The Indian team only delivers what was specified as a requirement. There is no thinking beyond that boundary.”
• “It’s bizarre: when we meet with the Indian team to discuss progress, only one of them talks to us. The other members of the Indian team sit, listen and nod approvingly.”
• “We have different expectations of when a piece of work is considered finished.”
• “I guess their English grammar is impeccable. But it is really difficult to understand spoken Indian English.”
• “Our Indian colleagues usually meet deadlines but the quality is often poor.”

Three dominant, recurring patterns

When reading these quotes, one might conclude that outsourcing to India was generally not a good idea. In those twenty years since I have been involved with outsourcing and offshoring projects to India, I have come to realise that there are three dominant, recurring patterns.

In the first pattern, a package of activities is curated to prepare both employees and the organisation for the upcoming changes. Employees are carefully brought up to par for collaborating with colleagues in India. Such preparation has to address the operational model as well as the intercultural dimension of the partnership.

In the second pattern, the outsourcing company organises merely a handful of informational sessions concerning how outsourcing should ideally be approached, who is responsible for what, and who the outsourcing partner is. What I also see quite often is that presentations are made about where the outsourcing partner is located (e.g. India), that country’s political and economic environment (e.g. democracy, free market) as well as key features pertaining to culture and traditions (e.g. importance of family, national festivities like Holi and Diwali, spicy curries, etc.). Such presentations are often made by staff members from the outsourcing partner company. It is, of course, true that Indians know their own country the best. But, do they have the acquired skills to view the implications of their native culture on professional life through the eyes of a foreigner specifically based on focussed research, deep realisation and extensive experience?

In the third pattern, I’m called in when the roof is already on fire. Outsourcing projects are often approached as a purely technical, organisational and financial undertaking. The underlying assumption is that planning, processes, technology and lower costs will inevitably lead to success. While decision makers involved in this pattern do hear and read that there are also “soft factors”, they decide to address these if and when they become wildly disruptive. In reality, however, inefficiency and dissatisfaction fester for quite some time until they suddenly erupt.

In all three patterns the people involved need to be approached based on their professional, mental and emotional standing with regards to the outsourcing programme. Those who have fears and reservations need to be informed about potential problems and failures. In my experience, it pays off to be totally honest. This is particularly important in the case of India because there is much confusion in the West about certain cultural characteristics in India (e.g. human rights, inequality of the sexes, caste system, etc.). This is the basis to show that you can solve problems which typically arise when outsourcing, and that it is realistically possible to develop a successful cooperation. Fearful pessimism must be paired with realistic optimism.

Outsourcing to a faraway country and deny any cultural difficulties

Those, on the other hand, who only see a fantastic opportunity in outsourcing to a faraway country and deny any cultural difficulties need to be informed of possible problems. They also need to know how to address such problems. This is especially important in the case of India due to the fact that many people from the West easily become enchanted by this country. I have often seen that people actually project many inner desires on India and thus romanticise it – even in a professional context. Euphoric optimism must be paired with informed realism.

And, finally, it must be made clear to both groups that neither active nor passive sabotage of the project will be tolerated.

The case being presented above belongs to the third pattern: fire in the roof. I was called by the pharma company to develop a curriculum for intercultural competence. I trained hundreds of employees in Germany, the United States and India, and supported the change management team at various levels.

It is a truism that many outsourcing projects nowadays are spread across multiple geographies and are virtually organised. But regardless of whether a project team is globally distributed or sits in a building just around the corner, it has become rare that all team members belong to the same ethnic, national or cultural group. Multiculturalism has become the norm, and so has the demand for intercultural competence.

Although outsourcing and offshoring have matured over the past 20 years or so, program and project managers from North America and Western Europe still struggle to appreciate their Indian colleagues’ approach to work. Reciprocally, Indian team members often feel disengaged when working with their counterparts in the West.

When, on the one hand, companies and people from India and, on the other, Europe or the United States cooperate, there will usually be intercultural conflicts. In most cases that has to do with one of the following five dimensions:

1. Hierarchy

One of the first things that Western Europeans and North Americans experience when cooperating with teams in India is the importance that seniority, status, and hierarchical order enjoy in India. A manager’s door is not always open, Indian employees stand up when a boss or client enters the room, and a team member without leadership role refrains from expressing contradiction to a leader’s statements. Still today, the heritage of the caste system subliminally influences thought and behaviour.

2. Leadership

Many people from the West learn the hard way that the leadership style common in Europe and North America (such as involving the team in decision-making), is not shared by all cultures around the world. In Germany and the USA you apply a participative style to managing employees. The individual is expected and expects to assume far-reaching autonomy. In India, however, many managers and employees alike prefer a more authoritarian style.

3. Communication

In most cases, I know the person from the West feels that he or she communicates sufficiently with colleagues in India. Anything more detailed would be leading up to cumbersome micro-management! The person from India, however, gets a creeping feeling that important information is being withheld. He or she feels as if they were at the bottom of the “food chain of communication”.

4. Time management

In Indian mythology there is a concept which suggests that your soul has a time budget of 311 trillion years to realise what it has been destined for. Also, there is the widespread notion that every soul lives through numerous incarnations on Earth. Even though individuals in India might not remind themselves of this concept in everyday life, its mythological power has an impact on the way work is approached. Depending on a situation’s context the individual may award spiritual fulfilment more importance than schedules and technical perfection. In most industrialised countries in the West, on the other hand, behaviour is moulded by Abrahamic mythology.

An individual has limited time at hand (one incarnation), and time is perceived by many to be a limited resource. Depending on a situation’s context, adherence to deadlines and delivery of perfect work may be valued more than oneness with creation!

5. Quality assurance

There is no absolute measurement for quality. Rather, it always refers to a given context and certain conditions therein. The benchmark for quality is set rather high in Western industrialised nations. People and corporations live in a largely well-functioning and at times luxurious environment thanks to rich financial means. Countries, however, which are only at the beginning or in the middle of their industrialisation refer to a standard of quality that is subjectively good, but poor from an industrialised or economically almost saturated viewpoint. These different perspectives have a deep impact on what kind of results engineers strive for.

Of course, everyday life in big metropolitan cities located in India is becoming increasingly more modern and progressive. More and more highly educated and far-travelled Indian citizens share values characterized by openness to the world and critical distance to traditional social norms. However, the majority of the approximately 1.2 billion Indians continue to adhere to traditional values and customs. With good reason: their cultural identity is based on a history of civilisation reaching as far back as at least 5,000 years.

This article was first published in Outsource #36.

About the Author:  Waseem Hussain is the Founder & CEO of a services company with a specialization on business with India. Before, he was the business manager of a globally operating outsourcing company, after heading a joint venture between a Swiss and an Indian software development company. His key strengths are quickly grasping the clients’ situation, crafting executable strategies and implementing steps towards success.